Posts : 26479 Points : 25311 Join date : 2013-01-16 Age : 35 Location : Admintown
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Tue 29 Aug 2017 - 5:32
masofdas The Next Miyamoto
Posts : 24029 Points : 24430 Join date : 2013-01-18 Age : 34 Location : VITA Island
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Wed 30 Aug 2017 - 16:55
JayMoyles wrote:
masofdas wrote:
but I just think 720p is just to much to ask in 2017
Depends on the size of your TV. Mine's is essentially a big PC monitor so resolution is by no means a concern for me. If you've played a Warriors game before, you'll know it's all about the action anyway.
I really do wish they hadn't gone solely for the 3DS games for this. Such a waste of a long and storied series. I'm fully expecting DLC at this rate.
49" but I think it's more of what I'm used to or got use to also the only Warriors, I've really given any time was Hyrule and a bit of Dragon Quest.
Huh on the 3DS, it's coming to New 3DS but I do wish it wasn't just to see what they could do if just focusing on the Switch.
Buskalilly Galactic Nova
Posts : 15085 Points : 15263 Join date : 2013-02-25 Age : 34 Location : Nagano
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Wed 30 Aug 2017 - 20:30
i wOuLd LIke To hAVe 60Fps buT i DOn't ThinK i CAn FroM pLaYiNG gaMEs In 108op-2160P NEarLy aLL tHe TiMe bACK dOWn to 720P oN a MASSive tV
ZeroJones I'M SO LONELY
Posts : 10465 Points : 9425 Join date : 2013-01-15 Age : 44 Location : North Midlands, England
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Wed 30 Aug 2017 - 21:27
Drunkalilly wrote:
i wOuLd LIke To hAVe 60Fps buT i DOn't ThinK i CAn FroM pLaYiNG gaMEs In 108op-2160P NEarLy aLL tHe TiMe bACK dOWn to 720P oN a MASSive tV
*Spongebob omitted*
How long does it take to type one of those out? Plus also... shouldn't it be FEW in the thread title and not 'FAW'?
Buskalilly Galactic Nova
Posts : 15085 Points : 15263 Join date : 2013-02-25 Age : 34 Location : Nagano
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Wed 30 Aug 2017 - 21:54
ZeroJones wrote:
How long does it take to type one of those out?
Ages, as it happens!
Quote :
Plus also... shouldn't it be FEW in the thread title and not 'FAW'?
I don't know what you're talking about . . .
JayMoyles Galactic Nova
Posts : 15896 Points : 15061 Join date : 2013-01-21 Age : 31 Location : The Shibuya River
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Wed 30 Aug 2017 - 21:54
I mean, nobody noticed till now...
JayMoyles Galactic Nova
Posts : 15896 Points : 15061 Join date : 2013-01-21 Age : 31 Location : The Shibuya River
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Sun 7 Jan 2018 - 23:32
Double post!
This was one of my Christmas games and it's been my current jam on Switch. As a mash-up between Fire Emblem and a traditional Warriors game, it couldn't be better - there's permadeath, the weapon triangle, class weaknesses, pair-ups, supports... if it's a mechanic in the 3DS FE games, it's been ported across to this pretty successfully.
That does raise a pretty disappointing element of the game though - the fact that nearly all the characters included are from Fates, Awakening or the first game in the series. I think Lyn's in here somewhere but she's not popped up yet in the story mode. My hope for DLC adding some of the more niche series has been scuppered too by the fact that it's just adding more Fateswakening and Shadow Dragon characters. Bit of a shame really.
Makes you wonder though if they've plans for a sequel...
masofdas The Next Miyamoto
Posts : 24029 Points : 24430 Join date : 2013-01-18 Age : 34 Location : VITA Island
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Sat 12 Feb 2022 - 11:38
I guess a sequel to this but also maybe Three Houses, tad like Age of Calamity, was announced at the direct. I was a tad disappointed it wasn't a new Fire Emblem, as what is Intelligent Systems doing??? Yet I do like a Musou (Yes EofGiz, I have not played SW5 or AoC yet) and the world of Three Houses that I am keen for Three Hopes.
Last edited by masofdas on Sun 13 Feb 2022 - 10:39; edited 1 time in total
JayMoyles Galactic Nova
Posts : 15896 Points : 15061 Join date : 2013-01-21 Age : 31 Location : The Shibuya River
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Sat 12 Feb 2022 - 12:57
JayMoyles from 2017 wrote:
I thought it was a proper Fire Emblem game at first and got really excited.
Point stands.
I guess this will be a "golden route" of sorts retelling of the big war between the three nations in FE:TH, but with everybody making peace rather than swathes of bodies and emotional scars. Dimitri will be keeping his eye this time round.
Buskalilly Galactic Nova
Posts : 15085 Points : 15263 Join date : 2013-02-25 Age : 34 Location : Nagano
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Sun 13 Feb 2022 - 2:31
I loved Three Houses and I really like Muso games, but I feel like I want to play through more campaigns of the actual game before this and I will literally never have time for that!
masofdas The Next Miyamoto
Posts : 24029 Points : 24430 Join date : 2013-01-18 Age : 34 Location : VITA Island
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Sun 13 Feb 2022 - 13:25
I feel ya Buska but hope it is like what Jay says a golden route of sorts.
Kriken Layton's Apprentice
Posts : 286 Points : 286 Join date : 2019-02-06
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Sun 13 Feb 2022 - 20:23
Intelligent Systems have been pretty busy. They're responsible for a lot of series, including Warioware which they released an entry to fairly recently.
And I mean, they're almost certainly working on a new mainline Fire Emblem game right now. There have been rumours going around that three FE games are in development, one of them being a remake. If true, that likely refers to this Warriors game, an entirely new mainline FE game, and a remake of FE4 probably.
Sadly I'm not too interested in Warriors games, so probably going to give this one a miss.
masofdas The Next Miyamoto
Posts : 24029 Points : 24430 Join date : 2013-01-18 Age : 34 Location : VITA Island
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Wed 13 Apr 2022 - 11:13
New trailer makes it seem Byleth is the antagonist, we've got three routes for a bit at least, and seems it has the levelling etc from a proper FE.
masofdas The Next Miyamoto
Posts : 24029 Points : 24430 Join date : 2013-01-18 Age : 34 Location : VITA Island
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Sun 19 Jun 2022 - 12:14
Anyone played the demo? I've not as I know I've got the game coming this Friday, and seen Lucky Crit play all the routes that are available in the demo along with CW even trying it & liking it.
That it does sound good so far.
JayMoyles Galactic Nova
Posts : 15896 Points : 15061 Join date : 2013-01-21 Age : 31 Location : The Shibuya River
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Thu 23 Jun 2022 - 18:24
I've not played the demo, but I think I might make this my next proper game once I'm done with The Outer Worlds. It sounds like Koei have been improving the Musou spin-off formula with each iteration they've done and the reviews have been positive as a whole.
Sounds like it might actually run somewhat decently too, which is staggering for a Musou game.
masofdas The Next Miyamoto
Posts : 24029 Points : 24430 Join date : 2013-01-18 Age : 34 Location : VITA Island
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Sat 25 Jun 2022 - 12:51
I've just past what I think is in the demo, and darn it does a lot quickly such as select house which doesn't tell you much about them that for CW who's not played Three Houses very confused on who to go for, time jump etc
Fun to play at the moment, which I think can now have tea parties.
Rum Disciple of Greener
Posts : 1492 Points : 1508 Join date : 2013-01-20 Age : 33 Location : Edinburgh
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Sat 25 Jun 2022 - 19:39
I tried the demo but came out of it thinking I won't get much out of it without having played Three Houses. I like Persona 5 Strikers and Age of Calamity - but that's probably largely to do with having played Persona 5 and BotW. So, maybe I'll play Three Houses one day before getting stuck into FEW! But not today.
masofdas The Next Miyamoto
Posts : 24029 Points : 24430 Join date : 2013-01-18 Age : 34 Location : VITA Island
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017 Wed 29 Jun 2022 - 12:19
I've now passed 22hrs, so a long game if ya going for all the routes which I'm unsure if 3 or 6 endings.
Enjoying the game a lot mind, and playing Three Houses certainly helps but think you'd be fine after the first few chapters where it kinda expects you to know the houses, as after that story close to what you would have got in that, just now as a Musou.
Sponsored content
Subject: Re: Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017
Fire Emblem Warriors - FEW games have such awful definition in 2017